<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jonathan On The Internets &#187; Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonathan-hardesty.com/tag/twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonathan-hardesty.com</link>
	<description>Pulp is disgusting, but so is my writing!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:28:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
<cloud domain='jonathan-hardesty.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>Putting the Rant Pants On</title>
		<link>http://jonathan-hardesty.com/2009/10/putting-the-rant-pants-on/</link>
		<comments>http://jonathan-hardesty.com/2009/10/putting-the-rant-pants-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>movieguyjon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blather]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[friendfeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hulu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pandora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathan-hardesty.com/?p=503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_504" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 455px"><img class="size-full wp-image-504" title="Election-movie-p04" src="http://jonathan-hardesty.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Election-movie-p041.jpg" alt="ORDER! ORDER! HE made the internets stupid!" width="445" height="298" /><p class="wp-caption-text">ORDER! ORDER! HE made the internets stupid!</p></div>
<p>It&#8217;s been too long since I&#8217;ve updated this blog, internets, but I don&#8217;t really plan on apologizing for that today. Instead, I&#8217;m going to don the rant pants and do some serious bitching. Here&#8217;s the short version: Facebook is stupid, twitter isn&#8217;t worth squat, and Hulu is about to get one less user. Whew. Now onto the long version.</p>
<p>Facebook is still hard to use. They&#8217;ve added a new feature where you can have a live feed roll down the page in &#8220;real time,&#8221; except it&#8217;s not real time. As a fairly adept internet user, I&#8217;ve usually got a minimum of four tabs open, one for each service and then random site hopping. If you are on another tab, the facebook timeline doesn&#8217;t update. You have to actually go back and make sure the site is the focus before it will do anything. You can tell that the idea of the &#8220;live feed&#8221; came from the Friendfeed guys, but it looks and feels like the Facebook guys are the ones who implemented it. Granted, the Friendfeed guys ARE the Facebook guys now so I&#8217;ll rephrase: Good idea, shitty implementation.</p>
<p>They&#8217;ve also removed cities from networks. So I guess the only networks I *can* have are schools or jobs? I question the usefulness of networks now, especially now that friend lists are becoming a big deal. Also, what good are networks in a twitter-ized environment anyway?</p>
<p>I heard somewhere that Twitter was worth billions. I kind of wish *I* had thought of a service with poor uptime and a shitty API so I could be worth billions too. Oh yeah, they&#8217;re coming out with lists, a feature that every other service has had for some time now. Hell, even twitter clients have list-like features.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll remember a blog post I made awhile back bitching about users who couldn&#8217;t be bothered to pay the small fees from Pandora. Yeah, those people are still tight asses, but there&#8217;s some news that might make this &#8220;pay for online content&#8221; debate a little bit more complicated. <a href="http://arstechnica.com/media/news/2009/10/hulu-will-have-to-add-benefits-if-it-wants-to-start-charging.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss" target="_blank">Hulu is expected to charge for their content</a> by 2010. I think this is a fairly retarded decision, considering the fact that the service isn&#8217;t out of it&#8217;s infancy yet (my opinion). Also, for a service like hulu to start charging, it needs to change the way it&#8217;s delivering it&#8217;s content. First of all, to me, pay for online content means zero advertising. It also means the service (like the article says) needs to extend beyond the website and extend *reliably*. Also, this eight day delay between episode air date and hulu release would have to stop. In fact, I would say that Hulu should just release the episode as soon as it airs.</p>
<p>Now, there was mention that there could be a tiered pricing scheme, which would make this into a less-sucky idea. But I&#8217;m going to put it out there that there won&#8217;t be much to the free tier. Sorry, but at this point, I see no reason to move to Hulu from Cable, or to even pay for both. Cable sucks, but at least it&#8217;s reliable and it won&#8217;t buffer if your connection isn&#8217;t as stellar.</p>
<p>Ugh.</p>
<div style="display:block"><small><em></em></small></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_504" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 455px"><img class="size-full wp-image-504" title="Election-movie-p04" src="http://jonathan-hardesty.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Election-movie-p041.jpg" alt="ORDER! ORDER! HE made the internets stupid!" width="445" height="298" /><p class="wp-caption-text">ORDER! ORDER! HE made the internets stupid!</p></div>
<p>It&#8217;s been too long since I&#8217;ve updated this blog, internets, but I don&#8217;t really plan on apologizing for that today. Instead, I&#8217;m going to don the rant pants and do some serious bitching. Here&#8217;s the short version: Facebook is stupid, twitter isn&#8217;t worth squat, and Hulu is about to get one less user. Whew. Now onto the long version.</p>
<p>Facebook is still hard to use. They&#8217;ve added a new feature where you can have a live feed roll down the page in &#8220;real time,&#8221; except it&#8217;s not real time. As a fairly adept internet user, I&#8217;ve usually got a minimum of four tabs open, one for each service and then random site hopping. If you are on another tab, the facebook timeline doesn&#8217;t update. You have to actually go back and make sure the site is the focus before it will do anything. You can tell that the idea of the &#8220;live feed&#8221; came from the Friendfeed guys, but it looks and feels like the Facebook guys are the ones who implemented it. Granted, the Friendfeed guys ARE the Facebook guys now so I&#8217;ll rephrase: Good idea, shitty implementation.</p>
<p>They&#8217;ve also removed cities from networks. So I guess the only networks I *can* have are schools or jobs? I question the usefulness of networks now, especially now that friend lists are becoming a big deal. Also, what good are networks in a twitter-ized environment anyway?</p>
<p>I heard somewhere that Twitter was worth billions. I kind of wish *I* had thought of a service with poor uptime and a shitty API so I could be worth billions too. Oh yeah, they&#8217;re coming out with lists, a feature that every other service has had for some time now. Hell, even twitter clients have list-like features.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll remember a blog post I made awhile back bitching about users who couldn&#8217;t be bothered to pay the small fees from Pandora. Yeah, those people are still tight asses, but there&#8217;s some news that might make this &#8220;pay for online content&#8221; debate a little bit more complicated. <a href="http://arstechnica.com/media/news/2009/10/hulu-will-have-to-add-benefits-if-it-wants-to-start-charging.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss" target="_blank">Hulu is expected to charge for their content</a> by 2010. I think this is a fairly retarded decision, considering the fact that the service isn&#8217;t out of it&#8217;s infancy yet (my opinion). Also, for a service like hulu to start charging, it needs to change the way it&#8217;s delivering it&#8217;s content. First of all, to me, pay for online content means zero advertising. It also means the service (like the article says) needs to extend beyond the website and extend *reliably*. Also, this eight day delay between episode air date and hulu release would have to stop. In fact, I would say that Hulu should just release the episode as soon as it airs.</p>
<p>Now, there was mention that there could be a tiered pricing scheme, which would make this into a less-sucky idea. But I&#8217;m going to put it out there that there won&#8217;t be much to the free tier. Sorry, but at this point, I see no reason to move to Hulu from Cable, or to even pay for both. Cable sucks, but at least it&#8217;s reliable and it won&#8217;t buffer if your connection isn&#8217;t as stellar.</p>
<p>Ugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jonathan-hardesty.com/2009/10/putting-the-rant-pants-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

